Yamaha avoids sporting penalty for Qatar absence, FIM president says
Jorge Viegas says current regulations do not allow a sporting sanction for Yamaha’s withdrawal, while a possible financial penalty remains unresolved.
Yamaha is not expected to face a sporting punishment for missing the Qatar Grand Prix, according to FIM president Jorge Viegas. He said the current regulations do not provide a sporting sanction for a rider who fails to appear at a race, removing the immediate basis for penalties such as points deductions or a race ban over this absence.
Yamaha withdrew both of its teams and all four riders from the event, citing its internal travel policy for the Middle East and safety concerns connected with the war in Iran. The decision came amid a broader dispute over the race: 19 of the 22 riders on the grid had signed a letter opposing the Qatar Grand Prix.
Two different readings of the sanction question
The MotoGP Group had warned that a boycott could bring sporting sanctions, including race bans. After Yamaha’s withdrawal, it also argued that the manufacturer’s breach of its commercial agreement with the championship carried sporting implications. Viegas called that position incorrect and said the FIM currently has no rule allowing such a punishment. He nevertheless left open the possibility of changing the regulations in the future.
The financial side of the dispute remains open. Yamaha could face a monetary penalty for breaching its commercial agreement, but neither the outcome nor the enforceability of such a measure is settled. That uncertainty is also linked to the company having followed a travel policy that was likely based on guidance from the Japanese government.
Carlos Ezpeleta described the matter as commercial and said any decision would follow discussions with Yamaha before being communicated. He also said the issue concerned the commercial relationship with Yamaha, while the sporting aspect belonged to the FIM. Viegas’s position therefore rules out a sporting sanction under the present rules, but does not close the separate commercial question.
THE STORY IN PHOTOS
3 photos
THE EVIDENCE BEHIND THE STORY
Sources
Spotted something that needs correcting? Contact the editorial team


